The title of this topic says it the most, just reply to this topic with a decimal numeric value higher than the last decimal numeric value stated. I say decimal because any other bases for numeric values can be taken as a different value. (10 in binary or base 2 would be 2, in octal or base 8 it would be 8, in hexadecimal or base 16 it would be 16, and I can go on.)
Your decimal numeric value can be expressed with +, -, *, /, |, !, ., variables, ^ and (). Irrational values and trigeometry functions are also acceptable.
If you express your decimal numeric value in words, that is also acceptable.
Also negative decimal numeric values as well.
Try not to jump over 2 place values, 2 decimals or using 2 of he same previously said symbols, like !. (1 to 100, 0.0001 to 0.01 and 2! to 2!!! are not acceptable.) (However! If you would like to add a decimal numeric value that is a decimal, (0.001) you may use multiple symbols. An example of this would be 1 + 1 / 100. This example uses 1 and 100 itself, but does not give the answer two more place values than it had previously.
To point out the obvious, DO NOT DECREASE THE VALUE. Symbols like / and - can still be used in ways to add to the value. (1 + (-(-1)) would be 2. And 1 + 1 / 10 would be 1.1.)
We should never reach infinity itself.
For reading's sake, please use spaces between symbols. This is strongly recommended, but truly optional. So write out "1+1" as "1 + 1"
Do not write out what your decimal numeric value gives. This will create math for the next user to calculate themselves.
No multi posting. Unless you decrease the value by accident, do not edit your equation to add to the value after you post.
I will start.
What I originally thought of: 1 divided by Graham's number, or in more detail:
1 / 3^^...^^3. Replace the "..." With previously mentioned value, without the "..." (The "..." Contains 3^^^^3 "^"'s.) Repeat that process 63 times.
But no. I do not want this topic to start off highly complex. I will start this topic with 0 itself.
Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
- SwifterTheDragon
- Quester Chao
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:38 am
- Contact:
Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
Last edited by SwifterTheDragon on Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:58 am, edited 8 times in total.
- Nano
- Legendary Chaos Chao
- Posts: 12256
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:50 am
- Motto: My kickstarter failed, but that's okay!
- Location: Union of Chaoviet Socialist Republics
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
0+.1
I think that's what you're getting at right?
are we allowed absolute values by the way?
I think that's what you're getting at right?
are we allowed absolute values by the way?
- SwifterTheDragon
- Quester Chao
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:38 am
- Contact:
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
I will edit the first post now. Is that what to call it? First post?
To directly answer your question, absolute values are entirely acceptable. However, only use absolute values in ways to increase the value. I was not thinking of absolute values at the time of creating this topic, but using absolute values are acceptable. Anyone got anything else I missed that are questionable?
.1 + 1 / 100
To directly answer your question, absolute values are entirely acceptable. However, only use absolute values in ways to increase the value. I was not thinking of absolute values at the time of creating this topic, but using absolute values are acceptable. Anyone got anything else I missed that are questionable?
.1 + 1 / 100
Last edited by SwifterTheDragon on Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
π - 3
(I hope irrational values are allowed)
(I hope irrational values are allowed)
- SwifterTheDragon
- Quester Chao
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:38 am
- Contact:
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
Updated the first post (honestly what do I call it? "First post" does not feel valid.)
To directly answer your question, irrational decimal numeric values are entirely acceptable. Irrational values did not come to mind at the time of creating this topic, but thanks for pointing it out. Is there anything else anyone is going to question? Not that I am annoyed by this, it actually improves this topic by doing so.
1 / 7 * 8 / 2 * 4 / 16 (1 / 7 * 8 / 2 * 4 / 16 > π - 3.)
To directly answer your question, irrational decimal numeric values are entirely acceptable. Irrational values did not come to mind at the time of creating this topic, but thanks for pointing it out. Is there anything else anyone is going to question? Not that I am annoyed by this, it actually improves this topic by doing so.
1 / 7 * 8 / 2 * 4 / 16 (1 / 7 * 8 / 2 * 4 / 16 > π - 3.)
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
Call it the "rules post" I guess? Or just "rules."
I guess trig functions.
Nothing else I can think of though, since this is a one dimensional number line.
Anyone trying to bring in imaginary numbers is just rude.
( 3/2 ) * 10 ^(-1)
I guess trig functions.
Nothing else I can think of though, since this is a one dimensional number line.
Anyone trying to bring in imaginary numbers is just rude.
( 3/2 ) * 10 ^(-1)
- SwifterTheDragon
- Quester Chao
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:38 am
- Contact:
Re: Reply with a decimal numeric value higher than the last one
Ro directly answer your question, trigeometry functions are entirely acceptable. Trigeometry functions did not come to mind at the time of creating this topic, so thank you for point of them out.
So... You strongly dislike the fact that I started this topic with 0?
Also I will now call the "First topic" "Rules" now. Thank you Mamkute for the suggestion as it feels more valid as a name.
(2 ^ 4 / ( ( 3 - 2 ) / ( ( - 6 ) + 8 ) * 64) / 10 + ((9 / 3 * 2) / 10) - .49.
So... You strongly dislike the fact that I started this topic with 0?
Also I will now call the "First topic" "Rules" now. Thank you Mamkute for the suggestion as it feels more valid as a name.
(2 ^ 4 / ( ( 3 - 2 ) / ( ( - 6 ) + 8 ) * 64) / 10 + ((9 / 3 * 2) / 10) - .49.